Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 24 post(s) |

Commander Ted
Sudden Buggery Swift Angels Alliance
400
|
Posted - 2013.01.11 20:21:00 -
[1] - Quote
So whats this hint about buffing active armor tanking? Will all modules just get a straight buff you think? Will their be an armor ASB? Will they use less cap or something? https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec. |

Commander Ted
Sudden Buggery Swift Angels Alliance
406
|
Posted - 2013.01.14 04:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:If you want to see more T1 BC's using link then make them:
A) Easy to fit B) More powerful than T3 links (Nerfing T3 links is a good way of achieving this) C) *Important* make fleet boosting limited range, similar to omni's for drone. D) Reduce the ammount of training needed to effectively use links.
If BC's all had 1 link they specialised in combined with the above, you would see fleets of them each with 1 link fitted each. I know the skillpoint issue is by far the biggest hurdle for younger players, and forcer older players to train alt's. If leadership is easier to train people would be more inclined to skill for link and incorporate them into their fits.
Personally i'd like to be able to make use of links solo. And i mean *truely solo*. I want to jump into a gate-camp and turn my link on and start fighting, without other people around or in fleet. It's like giving BC's a third bonus that is completely unique to the fit they want. VERSATILITY!
Why would I buy the T3 for doing links for a billion isk if I can get a t1 battlecruiser to do just as good a job. T3 = Versatility T2= Specialization T1= Cheap
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec. |

Commander Ted
Sudden Buggery Swift Angels Alliance
412
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 06:35:00 -
[3] - Quote
How come the harbingers second bonus only partly counters their favored weapons inherent weakness? That is stupid, minmatar get a second bonus to their guns range instead of rate of fire and they still use less cap. Give the harbinger a 3rd bonus. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec. |

Commander Ted
Sudden Buggery Swift Angels Alliance
430
|
Posted - 2013.01.18 03:46:00 -
[4] - Quote
Gallente get a 2.5% repper bonus and 5% resist bonus? https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec. |

Commander Ted
Sudden Buggery Swift Angels Alliance
437
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 04:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
Who cares if all the battlecruisers are meh. At least one of them is going to be better and everyone can just quickly adapt to using nothing but that one. As long as one ship is better than all the others thats all I care about. If the FOTM is t1 cruisers so be it, the caracals will blot out the sun. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec. |

Commander Ted
Sudden Buggery Swift Angels Alliance
477
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 15:20:00 -
[6] - Quote
Can the harbinger have a 3rd bonus other than capacitor use? I don't think something that missle and projectile boats get for free should be considered a bonus. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec. |

Commander Ted
Sudden Buggery Swift Angels Alliance
480
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 16:08:00 -
[7] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Maximus Andendare wrote:Fozzie, I'm curious: how does having high cap use create interesting player decisions on Amarr ships? I honestly can't see what you were referencing there.
High cap use as a drawback provides a different challenge to the player than the drawbacks of other weapons. The point isn't to remove all the interesting drawbacks, it is to make sure that the potential benefits are good enough to keep everything as competitive as possible. That weapon balancing goal is of course not something we have reached yet, but we are working towards it and rolling the cap use bonus into the weapon isn't the way to get there.
Just give the harbinger a 3rd bonus, or at least make whatever awesome stat it has over other battlecruisers show up in the description. I mean a drake gets a bonus to weapon damage and tank, meanwhile its weapons still use less cap than the harbinger. A bonus shouldn't be something that other ships get for free. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec. |

Commander Ted
Sudden Buggery Swift Angels Alliance
482
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 19:58:00 -
[8] - Quote
Marcus Jonas wrote:thx ccp for killing caldari !
first you downgrade the rockets and now make the drake to a pice of junk......
thats the time for saying good by.......... i quit this game.
thx ccp good job CCP has only buffed rockets and your an idiot. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec. |

Commander Ted
Sudden Buggery Swift Angels Alliance
482
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 19:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
Diesel47 wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:amarr were intended to be a drone race before the current changes. Thats why for ten years they've only had like 3 drone ships?  Personally I'm against making the races similar, or making ship progression derp-level easy. Difference is good. Its not easy its just sensible. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec. |
|
|